The most elemental component of a good research paper is top-quality research work. Working with the best scientists as well as in the best lab, with world-class infrastructure helps in this regard. Then make sure that the issues you are studying are important and of interest to others in the field. The most successful research papers are those that feature innovative research. But the best research papers also present their story in a clear and logical way. Because the idea behind the paper is clear, the writing is clear. Writing research papers with all of these qualities may require a bit of strategic thinking, practice, and skill.
Stay On Your Toes
As soon as you get to work in your new lab and start producing data at full tilt, you need to judge when you have enough data to write an article. Write too early and you may be wasting your time. Wait too long and you risk getting caught. Stop and write when there is enough data to tell a full and logical story. The key is to keep the paper in mind at all times as you perform the experiments.
Think about what numbers may already be in the paper and what information they will contain. The reader should come to the same conclusions that you have based solely on your results. So ask yourself if, after entering the results presented in your numbers, the reader will be led to the correct overall conclusion. Think about –
if your research paper offers a comprehensive overview of the topic at hand,
if you’re offering any alternative viewpoints to your research,
if there are do you have the numbers to back up the validity of these viewpoints,
Before undertaking your research work, remember to always ask yourself how it will contribute to the logic of the post. It can be pretty tough to remain objective and find the holes in your research when you’re completely engrossed in your research work.
Test your reasoning on your coworkers by asking them if you told a logical and compelling story after showing them a draft of your research paper.
Picking A Top-Notch Journal With A High-Impact Factor Is Half The Job Done
Directing your article to the most appropriate Scopus journal can save you a lot of energy and time as well as help you reveal your findings to the world sooner. So-called best journals value novelty and unexpected discoveries, but other journals may be more interested in in-depth and in-depth analyzes of critical processes. Go through the different journals and see where your work would be best suited.
Acquire feedback from colleagues and others in the field who have experience as journal authors, reviewers, and editors. It can be tempting to send your article to a leading high-impact journal, even if your results are not of the greatest novelty or of trending the zeitgeist. However, you can save a lot of time and reduce the chances of being disappointed if you send it to the right high-impact journal the first round instead of waiting for it to be rejected by a high-level journal.
Ensure That You’re Submitting The Best Version Of Your Paper
In the eyes of your readers (editors and reviewers included) the quality of the paper you send directly reflects the quality of the science behind it. A reckless approach to writing can undermine the most meticulous experience. It is therefore essential that the paper is free from reckless errors, especially in the data. Check and double-check that all information is consistent, that pictures and graphics represent what you say they represent.
Again, numbers are your best ally in conveying your story, so make them easy to understand. Each figure should only present one or a few related points, and together they should present all the important points of the document in an easy-to-understand way. Instill as much information about the data and conditions of the experiment as possible. Adding suitable legends for any figures in your research paper is also important, but the less the reader has to refer to it back and forth, the better.
Comply With All The Formatting Guidelines Of Your Chosen Journal
It is essential that the paper is written clearly and contains no spelling or grammatical errors, and that the logic is crisp. Show your article to your most critical friends and colleagues and take their advice seriously. Also, make sure all authors have seen and approved the submission.
Prepare To Nail The Reviewing Process
The best Scopus indexed journals are often either run by professional writers or by academics who take on the role of an editor for a set period of time. Both types of writers send articles to peer reviewers. These reviewers are scientists themselves who rate your article for accuracy, logic, and scientific relevance. Some journals have an initial screening stage where articles unlikely to go through the review process are rejected. Scientific editors make these initial screening decisions with advice from a board of reviewing editors.
Reviewers are selected by the publisher on the basis of their expertise in the field, often using large databases assembled by the journal and the publisher’s knowledge in that area.
Some scientists are better reviewers than others, they are more critical and in-depth, a fact that is quickly becoming recognized by editors. Traditionally, the review process can take anywhere from a few days to several weeks.
After review, the publisher makes a decision about the publication, taking into account all comments received. The journal’s editorial goals (sometimes journals decide certain areas of particular future interest or lesser interest) are factored into the decision, as is knowledge of the reviewers themselves and the context of their views.
A Convincing Cover Letter Goes A Long Way
One can expedite the review process by preparing a cover letter that includes, in very clear language, a concise version of all the logic of the document that specifies the significance and context of your research paper submission and work. Include any special considerations that the editor and reviewers should take into account in the cover letter.
These may include information about your own availability, related work being reviewed in other journals, or the names of other scientists working on the same issue and who would therefore have a conflict of interest in revising your article. Keep the list short, otherwise, the publisher will be forced to ignore your listing or get an uninformed review.
If it is necessary to request that a few people be excluded from the examination, explain why. Any related data not included in the main body of the document should be clearly accessible to reviewers, either as an appendix or through a publicly accessible database.
Dealing With Rejection In The Right Spirit
Inspite of your best efforts, you may get rejected by the journal of your choice. This doesn’t necessarily mean your paper isn’t good. A lot of high-impact factor journals reject more than ninety percent of the papers submitted to them. Rejection can be overwhelming, and it’s often a good idea to let at least a day pass by before you think about your course of action.
It is never a good idea to send an angry email to the editor explaining why the review process was unfair and biased. If, after careful consideration, you believe there has been a misunderstanding or error, some Web of Science Journal will receive a request for reconsideration, usually in the form of a letter or clear message explaining your point of view. Some publishers may be willing to have a phone conversation.
In most cases, the most effective and quickest course is to quickly reassess your journal choice, correct any deficiencies that may have been pointed out in the review process, reformat the paper for your second choice journal, and to send it.
You should keep in mind that the vast majority of rejected research papers are ultimately published elsewhere. Every submission that ends up being rejected gives you an opportunity to hone your writing and editing skills.